ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To make individual assessments using automated quantification methodology in order to screen for perfusion abnormalities in cerebral SPECT examinations among a sample of subjects with OCD. METHODS: Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to compare 26 brain SPECT images from patients with OCD individually with an image bank of 32 normal subjects, using the statistical threshold of p < 0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons at the level of individual voxels or clusters). The maps were analyzed, and regions presenting voxels that remained above this threshold were sought. RESULTS: Six patients from a sample of 26 OCD images showed abnormalities at cluster or voxel level, considering the criteria described above, which represented 23.07 percent. However, seven images from the normal group of 32 were also indicated as cases of perfusional abnormality, representing 21.8 percent of the sample. CONCLUSION: The automated quantification method was not considered to be a useful tool for clinical practice, for analyses complementary to visual inspection.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar uma amostra de pacientes com transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC), individualmente, empregando uma metodologia de quantificação automatizada para rastrear anormalidades de perfusão em exames de SPECT cerebral. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizado o Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) para comparar 26 imagens de SPECT cerebral de pacientes com TOC, individualmente, com um banco de 32 imagens de voluntários normais, usando o limiar estatístico de p < 0,05 (corrigido para comparações múltiplas ao nível do voxel individual ou clusters). Os mapas foram analisados procurando por regiões que apresentassem voxels acima desse limiar. RESULTADOS: Seis pacientes da amostra de 26 imagens com TOC mostraram anormalidades ao nível do cluster ou voxel, considerando os critérios descritos acima, os quais representaram 23,07 por cento. Contudo, sete imagens do grupo de 32 voluntários normais também foram apontadas com anormalidades de perfusão, que representou 21,8 por cento da amostra. CONCLUSÃO: O método de quantificação automatizada não foi considerado como uma ferramenta útil na prática clínica, como forma de análise complementar à inspeção visual.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/physiopathology , Brazil , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Brain Mapping/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Visual analysis is widely used to interpret regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) SPECT images in clinical practice despite its limitations. Automated methods are employed to investigate between-group rCBF differences in research studies but have rarely been explored in individual analyses. OBJECTIVES: To compare visual inspection by nuclear physicians with the automated statistical parametric mapping program using a SPECT dataset of patients with neurological disorders and normal control images. METHODS: Using statistical parametric mapping, 14 SPECT images from patients with various neurological disorders were compared individually with a databank of 32 normal images using a statistical threshold of p<0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons at the level of individual voxels or clusters). Statistical parametric mapping results were compared with visual analyses by a nuclear physician highly experienced in neurology (A) as well as a nuclear physician with a general background of experience (B) who independently classified images as normal or altered, and determined the location of changes and the severity. RESULTS: Of the 32 images of the normal databank, 4 generated maps showing rCBF abnormalities (p<0.05, corrected). Among the 14 images from patients with neurological disorders, 13 showed rCBF alterations. Statistical parametric mapping and physician A completely agreed on 84.37 percent and 64.28 percent of cases from the normal databank and neurological disorders, respectively. The agreement between statistical parametric mapping and ratings of physician B were lower (71.18 percent and 35.71 percent, respectively). CONCLUSION: Statistical parametric mapping replicated the findings described by the more experienced nuclear physician. This finding suggests that automated methods for individually analyzing rCBF SPECT images may be a valuable resource to complement visual inspection in clinical practice.